The term smart phone is described as basically a phone with more capabilities then an older phone from say the 1980s. I own an iPhone, and quite frankly I'd have to say its the greatest thing to effect society (and yes I think its better then sliced bread). But I say this for the unusual reasons that people don't normally think of. What I mean to say is yes it plays music and yes you can go on Facebook, but it does so much more. Everyday my phone wakes me up, tells me the temperature, tells me when and where my classes are, directs me, tells me where the bus is, whats for dinner, and most importantly; keeps me in the loop. I realize how attached I am with my iPhone, and in all honesty I would legitimately consider giving up one of my fingers before I would give up this phone. The sad part about this is that I guarantee that a large majority of people would do the same. Is this not pathetic? Phones are supposed to give us freedom to live our lives, and instead we are constantly checking for anything new or exciting. One day actually my roommate proposed an idea to me, one that I felt was pointless at the time. He told me to leave my phone in the room for an hour and just forget it even existed. That was true freedom. Not worrying about that new email or text message, but instead worrying about life. That's what I want back, my freedom, and I don't care if I have to do it one baby step at a time, call me a Freedom Fighter because I will not stop until my iPhone goes from a "must have" to a "boredom toy".
The mission of The Go Blue Crew is to examine New Media and its effects on modern day society. Through a close–knit relationship between us first–time bloggers, we are looking to make our mark in the blogosphere by providing innovative and interactive posts about the topic of New Media.
Monday, January 31, 2011
Freedom Fighters
The term smart phone is described as basically a phone with more capabilities then an older phone from say the 1980s. I own an iPhone, and quite frankly I'd have to say its the greatest thing to effect society (and yes I think its better then sliced bread). But I say this for the unusual reasons that people don't normally think of. What I mean to say is yes it plays music and yes you can go on Facebook, but it does so much more. Everyday my phone wakes me up, tells me the temperature, tells me when and where my classes are, directs me, tells me where the bus is, whats for dinner, and most importantly; keeps me in the loop. I realize how attached I am with my iPhone, and in all honesty I would legitimately consider giving up one of my fingers before I would give up this phone. The sad part about this is that I guarantee that a large majority of people would do the same. Is this not pathetic? Phones are supposed to give us freedom to live our lives, and instead we are constantly checking for anything new or exciting. One day actually my roommate proposed an idea to me, one that I felt was pointless at the time. He told me to leave my phone in the room for an hour and just forget it even existed. That was true freedom. Not worrying about that new email or text message, but instead worrying about life. That's what I want back, my freedom, and I don't care if I have to do it one baby step at a time, call me a Freedom Fighter because I will not stop until my iPhone goes from a "must have" to a "boredom toy".
Common Sense Media
What are kids looking at on the internet?Source |
Sunday, January 30, 2011
What's all the buzz about?
Online Video
Youtube is a website full of videos and clips. "of what?" you may ask, and the answer is- of anything. If you want a good laugh, you can find videos of people falling, videos of movie bloopers, videos of people doing imitations, dance videos, and anything else you can imagine. If you want to find a song but don't know what it's called, just type in the lyrics and youtube will find it for you and you can watch it's music video or the artist singing it live in concert. Although it is a very entertaining website, youtube also has redeeming qualities for professors and have recently been used in the classroom setting. There are math tutorials, economics tutorials, language tutorials, and even more. Basically, it helps make learning more fun and visual.
The way youtube works is that anyone can post a video. Each video then has a number under it, which counts the number of "hits" it has, or the amount of times it has been watched. The videos with the most hits goes on youtube's main page for easier accessibility. Under each video, there is also a space for people to leave comments, so it is a very interactive website in that everyone gets to share. Also, if you are looking for a specific video, just type it in youtube's search box and it'll find anything related to what you searched for. You can also use the main page to browse through different categories, such as sports or animals.
Here is a sample of what you can find on youtube. In fact, it is a video that incorporates clips from the 100 youtube videos with the most hits. Enjoy!
Visual Perception at Work
A snapshot of the homepage on Perez Hilton www.perezhilton.com |
This before and after Photoshopped picture of Faith Hill shows the drastic changes Photoshop can makewww.davidairey.com |
Friday, January 28, 2011
Evaluating ESPN.com
In terms of composition, I think the website is laid out in a very easy to navigate way. First, it has all the breaking news stories on the right side of the screen, ESPN even gives you the option to customize which stories you see based on which teams you are a fan of. Also, the most recent highlights and game results are in the middle of the screen, which allows you to see highlights and watch live games with only one click of the mouse. Also, the website is laid out in a way that allows you to easily get information on the sport of their choice. On the top of the screen, the user has the ability to go to the homepage of any sport you could imagine, whether it be football or even cricket!
Lastly, in terms of social, I think ESPN is trying to appeal to a very large audience of people. I think what makes them able to do this, is that they have information on nearly any sport you could imagine, so no matter what your interest is, there will almost always be something for you to read. Also, because the site is so easily navigated and the articles are not written in language that is all that complicated, I think that nearly anyone can enjoy the website.
After reading the excerpt from "Visual Communications" I learned a few interesting things, that I think explain why the website is laid out the way it's. First, I learned that all images have a focal point, and that is what our eye catches first. I think this explains why ESPN almost always puts a catchy or interesting image right in the center of the screen. Lastly, I learned that when people are reading things they like it to be evenly spaced. This explains why all articles written on the site are evenly spaced, and all the paragraphs are close to the same length. I found the logic behind this to be very interesting.
To help those of you who have to respond to my post here are a few websites that you might want to consider looking at to get some ideas: yahoo.com, cnn.com and usatoday.com
This is a screen shot of how ESPN.com appeared during my evaluation of the site. |
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Blogs, Academic or Non Academic that is the question
True or False? There is a difference between academic and non academic Blogs.The answer is True. Now going off of that answer, what exactly is the difference? Well what I have come to understand is that Academic blogs are made up of both design and content. On behalf of the content they are normally written by experts of the topic who create an extremely serious atmosphere. The dry voices accompanied with the heavy text causes only someone who is deeply interested in the subject to want to continue reading. Non Academic Blogs on the other hand do not specify in one subject matter. Instead they cover all different areas of a subject in a way that is less in depth with a more informal tone.
True or False? Some Academic Blogs are less interactive than non academic blogs? Once again the answer is True. Academic Blogs are more for a small focused group whereas non academic blogs are open to public opinion.
Now that I spelled out the major aspects of what makes these two blog types different, let's focus on a few non academic blogs that have their own specific traits.
For instance, the blog "I don't know, what do YOU want to eat?" already has a friendlier approach. The background is much more colorful and vibrant compared to an academic blog post about political science. Quotes like, "I'm running out the door to fulfill my civic duty at the court house downtown, but I wanted to quickly post our simple, but absolutely delicious dinner from last night " show that the author is extremely open and literally says whatever is on his mind.
True or False? A Science Blog is always academic. Surprisingly the answer to this question is false. The Geekdad blog is categorized under science and technology but the quirky pictures and comics make the blog comical rather than serious. What also grabbed my attention was the fact that each post was not written by the same person. Several different people were posting stories about the newest technological discoveries within their lives making this site extremely personal and interactive and therefore non academic.
Basically what I just unintentionally did was place all negative characteristics under academic blogging and all positive characteristics under non - academic blogging but that is not the case. Yes, they are both extremely different but it does not mean one is better than the other. I personally love entertainment and interactivity but that does not mean that I am not interested in the serious stuff such as a blog discussing a topic I choose to major in or a blog simply informing me about a historical viewpoint. Overall the blogosphere would not exist if it did not contain these different kinds of blogs. I'll leave you with one open - minded question. Knowing the difference between the two blogs, if you were outside of this classroom blogging on your own which blog would appeal more to you? Based on your personality and your interests I will be interested to see what kind of blog you would want to create. I'll start off by saying, my personal interests are humor, and entertainment with many pictures and graphics as oppose to an overflow of text. Therefore, Chelsea Handler's blog would definitely be something I would try to replicate (in my own way of course).
Here's another link that shows a list of about 43 humorous non academic blog sites that you might be interested in...http://www.squidoo.com/funnyblogs
Enjoy!
(Picture: http://www.nolandgrab.org/archives/2007/09/it_came_from_th_123.html)
Blog Evaluations
Look what I've stumble(d)upon
There is no true number that can define the number of pages on the internet. There are billions upon billions, each with something different to inform it's reader. Although there are billions of pages that can teach one how to cure a disease, write a poem, cook, or basically do anything, my favorite does none of the above. It is called StumbleUpon, a website that links you to other websites based off of your interests and past usage. Users make accounts and after a few minutes of questions the stumbling begins. In an age of New Media, where a woman in China can upload a photo of what they are wearing and blog about it with a teenager from Chicago, websites can now learn what you like and act accordingly. But is this new media?Is a website learning considered New Media? This is the real question. My personal account always knows how to get to me, it varies in results from mascot beating up a fan to a video of a squirrel water skiing to even showing me an invisible Swedish tree house. This website takes users to websites never heard of before, exploring the unknown areas of cyberspace. Could this be a new type of New Media, websites that learn about the user and bring them to places that will potentially catch their interest? The world may never have a true definition of New Media, so for now all I can do is stumble.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Motion Controlled Gaming
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Academic Blogs in the Blogosphere
What criterion does a particular blog need to meet in order to be considered an academic blog? After reviewing several blogs labeled “academic,” I’ve come up with my own understanding of what these criterion may be. For one, academic blogs are organized. Arguably the most noticeable similarity between all of these blogs was the fact that they had categories and archives. Both of these factors allow for easy navigation of any given blog. Another obvious factor is the more professional writing these bloggers exhibit in comparison to non-academic blogs. Although the blogger’s opinion comes through in his or her writing, the personal relationship that Andrew Sullivan discusses in his article Why I Blog is not seen to the same extent. Academic blogs have more of a defined purpose, discussing a particular topic such as art or politics. Non-academic blogs don’t necessarily have a particular theme throughout; instead they are more similar to the very public diary of the blogger. Because of this, the academic blogger does not express himself/herself to as great of an extent. Another part of the academic blog that stands out to me is the presence of Comment Policies. Crooked Timber has a Comment Policy that states
We welcome comments from readers on posts, but you do so as guests in our private space. Concepts of ‘censorship’ are not applicable. If your comments are blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic we will delete them and ban you from the site. The same goes for comments which are personally defamatory or insulting or which seek to derail a thread through provocation of one kind or another.
However, in addition to these observations, I’ve also noticed that academic blogs differ in content as well as format. That is, the majority of the academic blogs in question included blog posts from several different contributors. However, some blogs, such as art(h)ist’ry and BollySpace 2.0, have only one blogger. While some academic bloggers are distinguished professors, other academic bloggers such as in the Intro to Politcal Theory Blog are students learning about the topic in discussion themselves. Also, some blog homepages, such as Crooked Timber, Front Porch Republic and Public Reason, included only excerpts of blog posts, linking the reader to another page in order to continue reading the entire post; other homepages, like that of art(h)ist’ry, Intro to Politcal Theory Blog, Observations on Film Art, Sweetland and BollySpace 2.0, displayed full posts, allowing the viewer to read them in their entirety. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a certain length that a post has to meet in order to have its place in an academic blog. For example, art(h)ist’ry contained relatively short posts with a lot of photographs. Perhaps the academic blog that stands out the most in comparison to the other blogs is Front Porch Republic. The format of this blog can be more closely associated with that of an online newspaper than the format of most other blogs. All of these variances between different academic blogs leave for a fuzzy understanding of the term as a whole.
Even my current understanding has left me with many unanswered questions. For example, Andrew Sullivan spoke greatly about the unfinished fashion of a blog; the raw emotion, the time constraints that don’t allow for over-thinking or very much editing. If this is what makes a blog unique from other forms of journalism, then where does an academic blog fit in with all of this? An academic blog is expected to be well thought out. For the most part the reader seeks creditable facts as opposed to opinion and speculation, although both of these factors have their place within academic blogs. Another key characteristic of a blog is the interactive nature between the blogger and reader. To what extent does this interactive aspect prevail in the academic blogosphere? These are just a few of the many remaining questions that linger in my mind after evaluating several academic blogs.
http://www.masternewmedia.org/online-collaborative-writing-how-blogs-and-wikis-are-changing-the-academic-publishing-process/
Academic Blogging, What's your definition?
Now lets look at blogs that pertain to a variety of different viewers. The Front Porch Republic discusses topics from "Women, The Cosmos, and Cosmetics" to "Art and Community." Although this blog has a satirical tone and all viewers must understand the same humor, the topics of discussion continue to vary. Similarly to the Front Porch Republic Sullivan's blog, The Atlantic, discusses topics that are completely different from one another. For instance one blog he discusses his reaction to 9/11 whereas another blog discusses his views on the War in Iraq, Once again all viewers share a similar interest in Sullivan's honesty and emotion, but overall Sullivan is not writing for a specific audience. He is simply writing about a majority of topics and he does not concentrate on a definite group of people.
Okay now lets backtrack. What is an Academic Blog? Does the information have to be directed to a specific audience such as a group of scientists interested in the same thing or can the blog contain a variety of information for an assortment of different readers whether they are doctors, pilots, or chefs?
OR
Does the Blog have to be only writing about the facts or can Sullivan's blog be considered Academic, writing about his personal opinions about a topic?
After researching Academic Blogs, I came to the conclusion that they are written to provide information to an audience. Having this in mind my major questions have to do with evaluating the information that is being displayed. Can it cover a variety of different topics or should it focus on just one academic topic? Can it be someone's opinion on a subject matter or does it just have to be straight facts? What do you guys think?
(Pictures: http://gettyimages.com, http://www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1098 2019, http://languagearts.pppst.com/fact-opinion.html
Articles: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/11/why-i-blog/7060/, http://arthistorian.wordpress.com/, http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/, http://polsci101.wordpress.com/, )
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Evaluating Some Academic Blogs
First of all, what constitutes an academic blog? What is the difference between a regular blog and an academic one? I myself didn't know, so I searched online for to find out some information. Academic blogs are "weblogs written by professors that will help you to learn about what life is like as a professor both inside and outside of the classroom" according to about.com. Shawn Moore, from hastac.orc seems to think that "academic blogs tend to be rather static and traditional posts that disseminate information rather than encourage participation and engagement". According to Brad DeLong on Wikipedia.com, the academic blogosphere is "a kind of invisible college".
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
How tech has changed society
I was walking through the diag today and saw a kid screaming by himself in an open patch of grass. In earlier times this man would have been assumed to have been either crazy or extremely unusual, but i realized that he had a bluetooth headset in his ear. Now my understanding of he situation has completely changed from him being a little crazy to being someone completely normal on their phone. Technology not only changes the way people get from place to place or how people do things, but now it changes social norms as well as perceptions of individuals. I find it ironic that it can change the way society works overall, its kind of like a form of evolution. New Media has changed the world in many ways, and this small change on society is a perfect example of how a small piece of technologly placed in ones ear can change them from a looney tune to a businessman.
A Cell Phone With Wallet Capabilities
Because all of this technology is quite new, there are many questions that still have to be answered....the first one being which company will emerge as the leader in this new field. Many experts believe PayPal, which processed over 700 million dollars in mobile payments in 2010 alone, will be the one to break the bank with this new technology. However, for this to happen they will need the cooperation of credit card companies such as American Express and Visa, who would prefer to bypass PayPal as the middle man and create their own technologies with cell phone providers such as T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon Wireless. Over the next few years, it should be interesting to see how these technologies evolve, especially when analysts project it to be a trillion dollar industry by the year 2020.
TwitChange 2.0
Almost unanimously, Twitter is considered to be a new media source in various aspects. This includes the way in which media is traveling from one source to many sources instantly, the response method which allows it to be interactive and the fact that anyone with a computer and an internet connection can participate in the phenomenon. One of the greatest things about twitter is that fans get to feel close to their celebrity idols by following their everyday tweets, and vice versa celebrities can reach out to their fans on what seems to be a more personal level, instantly.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
A pet's facebook
Great Products for a Great Price
A perspective on Sullivan's "Why I Blog"
In Andrew Sullivan’s “Why I Blog”, the author explains all of the addictive features and what blogging has to offer.
The writer initially begins by stating how it allows for anyone to publish themselves on the largest stage possible, the Internet, and from there have the potential to write or blog something that no one has ever thought of before. The fact that blogging is instantaneous is something new for society; the idea that anyone can say anything and have it heard virtually around the world is remarkable in a time when the world is dominated by news reporters and newspapers. Blogs bring the power back to the people and keep a lot of it away from big business, which is why I find it extremely ironic when people have the job title “Professional Blogger”. In this sense blogging is a simple way for people to voice their unheard opinion, whether it be on a movie, political decision, or sporting event. This is the first thing blogs bring to the table; they give power to the little guy.
Later in the article Sullivan brings up another interesting thought, the idea that blogs have to be instant to survive. This is a very valid statement in the sense that if a blog is to slow to voice an opinion, the “professional” writers at newspapers and magazines can voice their opinions as well, many a time making blogs less and less interesting to read. Blogs live in the instant something happens, which is the beauty of a blog. It is now. If blogs had to be revised or published it would not be a blog, but rather an online article.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Response To Andrew Sullivan's "Why I Blog"
One of the first points that Sullivan makes that I found myself thinking about was how other types of writers such as novelists and journalists have extended periods of time to plan their writing and when it's done there are professionals to look it over. For bloggers on the other hand, the deadline is now and you are your own editor. Once you click the Publish Post button, that writing is gone and you cant get it back. What makes it even harder for bloggers is that once they publish something with an error there is no section of the blog the next day that can correct the mistype or inaccurate statistic. You're stuck dealing with vicious emails or response posts telling you how stupid you are for misspelling a word or that your writing is no longer credible because you had a few incorrect numbers.
Another compelling point that Sullivan makes is the idea of "being yourself" when you blog. I found it really interesting how he talked about bloggers attempting to hide themselves from their audience. I think if you approach blogging with that kind of attitude, you can not possibly write an attention grabbing blog. I think this shows that in order to write a blog that is truly you, the blogger must have some courage and self confidence. The next point Sullivan makes, is the one I found most interesting. He talks about how over the course of his blogging career the posts he remembers most are the ones that have to do with the most emotional issues. He talks about how he and the readers of his blog experienced emotional events such as 9/11 together. I very much agree with Sullivan when he says that catastrophic events such as 9/11 force out the "real" you and that it's impossible to write a blog during trying times without revealing a lot about yourself and creating a strong bond with your readers. However, despite this personal connection that can be made from blogging, I disagree with Sullivan because I think many personal blog/websites are losing their individuality. Sites such as Perez Hilton that were once started by a single aspiring soul are now carried out by others and Hilton himself does little to actually maintain the site.
The last few points that Sullivan made were also ones that I found to be interesting. He finished the article by talking about why making a successful blog is much harder than writing say, an article or book. I think the main reason for this belief is that traditional literature is expected to have been planned out and well edited. Blog posts, are written spontaneously and can be edited by one person: the writer. The last point and maybe most important point Sullivan makes is that no matter what blog you are on you will always see two sides of the spectrum, unlike traditional literature which can lean in a single direction. The reason for this being that because blogs are all connected there is sure to be a link to a the opposing side's argument.
I enjoyed reading Sullivan's article, and I now understand why blogging is like taking a narcotic.