Monday, January 31, 2011

Freedom Fighters


The term smart phone is described as basically a phone with more capabilities then an older phone from say the 1980s. I own an iPhone, and quite frankly I'd have to say its the greatest thing to effect society (and yes I think its better then sliced bread). But I say this for the unusual reasons that people don't normally think of. What I mean to say is yes it plays music and yes you can go on Facebook, but it does so much more. Everyday my phone wakes me up, tells me the temperature, tells me when and where my classes are, directs me, tells me where the bus is, whats for dinner, and most importantly; keeps me in the loop. I realize how attached I am with my iPhone, and in all honesty I would legitimately consider giving up one of my fingers before I would give up this phone. The sad part about this is that I guarantee that a large majority of people would do the same. Is this not pathetic? Phones are supposed to give us freedom to live our lives, and instead we are constantly checking for anything new or exciting. One day actually my roommate proposed an idea to me, one that I felt was pointless at the time. He told me to leave my phone in the room for an hour and just forget it even existed. That was true freedom. Not worrying about that new email or text message, but instead worrying about life. That's what I want back, my freedom, and I don't care if I have to do it one baby step at a time, call me a Freedom Fighter because I will not stop until my iPhone goes from a "must have" to a "boredom toy".


http://www.antarasdiary.com/photography-lovely-hearts/

Common Sense Media


What are kids looking at on the internet?Source

With the realm of new media constantly expanding and becoming more and more accessible, one has to wonder: what is appropriate for children? Common Sense Media is a website that parents can use in order to decide what they feel comfortable with their children viewing in terms of both new medias, and old medias. The website includes reviews for movies, games, apps, websites, TV, books and music, as well as an entire section that provides advice for parents. Also, there are recommendations for what are considered to be "the best" in any of these categories. The website can also be viewed in terms of your child's individual age. Common Sense Media does not only direct to the parents would may be inappropriate, but it gives detailed explanations as to why it may be. In the Parent Advice section, for example, one of the topics is "The Side Effects of Media." This section includes statistics, advice & answers and links to related resources and articles for the topic in discussion. The same is applicable for all other sections of this site. I think this is a very good organization to have at this time. Since there is so much media on the internet and on television, it is very hard for a parent to know what is or isn’t appropriate for children, and I think this is a very big problem with some parenting these days. I don’t think there is a lack of caring on the parents’ behalf, there is just too much media out there for a parent to monitor every single thing their child encounters. Although I believe it is very hard for parents to monitor all of this media, I think this website definitely helps narrow it down and makes it a lot easier. The following video is a commercial aired on television for Common Sense Media. In this commercial the young girls have found a racy song and music video on the internet and are inappropriately reenacting the video. The commercial inadvertently suggests that if the parents had used this website, they perhaps could have prevented their children from viewing this video.


Sunday, January 30, 2011

What's all the buzz about?


After really looking at my gmail account I realized that it has a link on the left hand side that says Buzz with a colorful symbol next to it. Never really paying attention to what that meant I never knew how cool this link really was. My friend recently just told me about GoogleBuzz. You just click that link and quickly make a profile and just like twitter and facebook you are able to share comments with your friends. You can tell anyone what you are doing at the time or for a visual effect you can even upload photos and videos. What is also great is that there are privacy settings. You could make your personal profile public to the web or private to your small group of followers. The buzz only works if you get all your friends involved so definitely tell them about it because it seems pretty interesting. The more I try to figure out what it actually is the more it resembles a combination of facebook and twitter. The whole idea of following people and posting comments but having the ability to add larger amounts of text without abbreviations lets us have the best of both worlds. Honestly I am not really sure what else this has to offer I am currently trying to figure out how to actually follow someone but i provided a youtube video that helps explain more benefits of the buzz.

Online Video

youtube.com is such a well-known website that it has become a common verb. For instance, one may hear a friend say "hey will you take a video of me so I could youtube it later?" or "what are the lyrics to that song I like? I want to youtube it". To outsiders, people who might not be on the web very often, these sentences make no sense. What is youtube anyway? What does it mean?
Youtube is a website full of videos and clips. "of what?" you may ask, and the answer is- of anything. If you want a good laugh, you can find videos of people falling, videos of movie bloopers, videos of people doing imitations, dance videos, and anything else you can imagine. If you want to find a song but don't know what it's called, just type in the lyrics and youtube will find it for you and you can watch it's music video or the artist singing it live in concert. Although it is a very entertaining website, youtube also has redeeming qualities for professors and have recently been used in the classroom setting. There are math tutorials, economics tutorials, language tutorials, and even more. Basically, it helps make learning more fun and visual.
The way youtube works is that anyone can post a video. Each video then has a number under it, which counts the number of "hits" it has, or the amount of times it has been watched. The videos with the most hits goes on youtube's main page for easier accessibility. Under each video, there is also a space for people to leave comments, so it is a very interactive website in that everyone gets to share. Also, if you are looking for a specific video, just type it in youtube's search box and it'll find anything related to what you searched for. You can also use the main page to browse through different categories, such as sports or animals.
Here is a sample of what you can find on youtube. In fact, it is a video that incorporates clips from the 100 youtube videos with the most hits. Enjoy!

Visual Perception at Work

          According to Hilligross and Howard’s Visual Communication, there is a lot that goes into the way we view images. That is, visual perception is an “active, thinking process of planning for, as well as interpreting, sensory data from the eyes.” Gestalt principles are constantly being utilized in our daily vision processes. Two of these principles are especially helpful when both interpreting a document as a viewer and creating documents as an author: separating figure from ground and grouping by proximity and similarity. Authors of websites and blogs need to especially keep these principles in mind when creating documents as to not overwhelm and confuse the viewer.


A snapshot of the homepage on Perez Hilton
www.perezhilton.com

In the above image of Perez Hilton’s blog, we can dissect the Gestalt principles being employed. First of all, we can separate the figure from the ground using figure-ground separation. For example, we can see the title “Perez Hilton” separate from the white striped background. In the right-hand column, there is a pink box grouping together clips from “Perez TV.” The pink background encompassing all of the video clips, as well as the similarity and proximity of these clips from each other allows us to group these images together.
In Visual Methodologies, Gillian Rose discusses the truthfulness of a photograph. How true is a photograph? People generally consider photographs as a means of capturing things exactly the way that they are. However, this is not always the case. For example, in older times cameras were not very light sensitive at all, meaning that in order for a clear photograph to be taken, the subjects had to remain very still for several seconds. This stillness hardly allows for any capturing of real events. However, more recently, cameras have become much more light sensitive, allowing for snapshots to be taken at any given moment with close to perfect clarity.
With advances in the technology behind cameras, however, came advances in other industries as well. David Airey discusses just this in a blog post titled “Sex, Lies and Photoshop.” Although things can now be captured instantly just the way they are, people now want to see things better than they really are! Now, when wondering about the truthfulness of a photograph, we not only need to consider the technology based on the time period, but we also need to ask ourselves what technology may have been implemented following the click of the camera. 

This before and after Photoshopped picture of Faith Hill
shows the drastic changes Photoshop can make
www.davidairey.com
This video shows another great example of how makeup
and Photoshop can change an image or person

After reading both of these excerpts, I better understand the technicalities that go into the production of any type of website or blog. Without knowing these basic tendencies it would be nearly impossible to make a productive webpage in which readers enjoy reading.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Evaluating ESPN.com

After reading the excerpt from "Visual Communication" by Hilligross and Howard and Gillian Rose's "Visual Methodologies"I realized that there is a great deal of information about why people interpret visuals the way they do. Whether you're looking at a website, a picture or a delicious piece of apple pie, your eyes and mind respond to everything you see differently. In Rose's piece, she talks about modalities, which are the aspects of design on each website. The modalities that Rose focuses on are technological, compositional and social. I decided that an interesting website or image I could relate this to is ESPN.com, a website that has great sophistication in all of these categories. First, in terms of technology, something that enhances this website is how much information it makes available to the viewer. As soon as you get onto the main page, you have a handful of multimedia options that immediately catch your eye. Also, ESPN recently gave users the ability to watch ESPN channels on their computer, which presents users with a new technology that had never been available on the site before.

In terms of composition, I think the website is laid out in a very easy to navigate way. First, it has all the breaking news stories on the right side of the screen, ESPN even gives you the option to customize which stories you see based on which teams you are a fan of. Also, the most recent highlights and game results are in the middle of the screen, which allows you to see highlights and watch live games with only one click of the mouse. Also, the website is laid out in a way that allows you to easily get information on the sport of their choice. On the top of the screen, the user has the ability to go to the homepage of any sport you could imagine, whether it be football or even cricket!

Lastly, in terms of social, I think ESPN is trying to appeal to a very large audience of people. I think what makes them able to do this, is that they have information on nearly any sport you could imagine, so no matter what your interest is, there will almost always be something for you to read. Also, because the site is so easily navigated and the articles are not written in language that is all that complicated, I think that nearly anyone can enjoy the website.

After reading the excerpt from "Visual Communications" I learned a few interesting things, that I think explain why the website is laid out the way it's. First, I learned that all images have a focal point, and that is what our eye catches first. I think this explains why ESPN almost always puts a catchy or interesting image right in the center of the screen. Lastly, I learned that when people are reading things they like it to be evenly spaced. This explains why all articles written on the site are evenly spaced, and all the paragraphs are close to the same length. I found the logic behind this to be very interesting.

To help those of you who have to respond to my post here are a few websites that you might want to consider looking at to get some ideas: yahoo.comcnn.com and usatoday.com


This is a screen shot of how ESPN.com appeared during my evaluation of the site.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Blogs, Academic or Non Academic that is the question


True or False? There is a difference between academic and non academic Blogs.The answer is True. Now going off of that answer, what exactly is the difference? Well what I have come to understand is that Academic blogs are made up of both design and content. On behalf of the content they are normally written by experts of the topic who create an extremely serious atmosphere. The dry voices accompanied with the heavy text causes only someone who is deeply interested in the subject to want to continue reading. Non Academic Blogs on the other hand do not specify in one subject matter. Instead they cover all different areas of a subject in a way that is less in depth with a more informal tone.

True or False? Some Academic Blogs are less interactive than non academic blogs? Once again the answer is True. Academic Blogs are more for a small focused group whereas non academic blogs are open to public opinion.

Now that I spelled out the major aspects of what makes these two blog types different, let's focus on a few non academic blogs that have their own specific traits.

For instance, the blog "I don't know, what do YOU want to eat?" already has a friendlier approach. The background is much more colorful and vibrant compared to an academic blog post about political science. Quotes like, "I'm running out the door to fulfill my civic duty at the court house downtown, but I wanted to quickly post our simple, but absolutely delicious dinner from last night " show that the author is extremely open and literally says whatever is on his mind.

True or False? A Science Blog is always academic. Surprisingly the answer to this question is false. The Geekdad blog is categorized under science and technology but the quirky pictures and comics make the blog comical rather than serious. What also grabbed my attention was the fact that each post was not written by the same person. Several different people were posting stories about the newest technological discoveries within their lives making this site extremely personal and interactive and therefore non academic.

Who else can create a non academic blog better than Perez Hilton? In my opinion, Perez Hilton hits upon all major aspects of the non academic blog. With the hot pink background, the satirical tone, the gossip columns overflowing with comments, and the endless amount of videos and pictures, Perez Hilton's blog is the exact opposite of academic.

Lastly, The Scholars and Rogues blog seems academic by the title, but after looking into the content, I was fooled once again. Serious topics such as unemployment were titled, "One reason you didn't get the job you were perfect for: can we ask companies to stop the fake job Dog and Pony Show process?" The article was under the topic of business and management but it proceeds to talk in a tone that is far less serious. Upon talking about unemployment the blogger states, "In a number of cases I was so perfect that it seemed like the only difference between the job posting and my resume was my name and contact information at the top of the page." Clearly, the comedy in this blog makes a serious discussion that may not appeal to you at first, seem comical and entertaining to many by the end of the post. What also makes this blog non academic is the whole fact of poking fun at the government, economy, sports, and food. You name it, this blog tears it's contents apart limb from limb, but that's what makes it so appealing. Readers are not willing to take their eyes away from the page, or at least I could say that it successfully grabbed my full attention.

Basically what I just unintentionally did was place all negative characteristics under academic blogging and all positive characteristics under non - academic blogging but that is not the case. Yes, they are both extremely different but it does not mean one is better than the other. I personally love entertainment and interactivity but that does not mean that I am not interested in the serious stuff such as a blog discussing a topic I choose to major in or a blog simply informing me about a historical viewpoint. Overall the blogosphere would not exist if it did not contain these different kinds of blogs. I'll leave you with one open - minded question. Knowing the difference between the two blogs, if you were outside of this classroom blogging on your own which blog would appeal more to you? Based on your personality and your interests I will be interested to see what kind of blog you would want to create. I'll start off by saying, my personal interests are humor, and entertainment with many pictures and graphics as oppose to an overflow of text. Therefore, Chelsea Handler's blog would definitely be something I would try to replicate (in my own way of course).

Here's another link that shows a list of about 43 humorous non academic blog sites that you might be interested in...http://www.squidoo.com/funnyblogs

Enjoy!

(Picture: http://www.nolandgrab.org/archives/2007/09/it_came_from_th_123.html)





Blog Evaluations

The following are the evaluations I have for each respective blog

Arts/Entertainment: Perez Hilton
Purpose:
- Distribute "secret" information on the lives of celebrities
-Give everyday people a look into the lives of the people we watch on TV
Voice:
-Very informal, almost like its a friend telling you a secret rather then a blog reciting information
Design:
-Very feminine in the sense that there is a pink backdrop as well as an advertisement for a TV show to be aired on "Women's Entertainment"
-Simply vertical design
Multi-Media:
-Pictures and Video links are everywhere, making this a very visually stimulating page


Journalistic: Daily Beast
Purpose:
-Much more of a news orientated blog when compared with Perez Hilton
-Article titles such as "Oscar Nominations" and "Remapping the Union" seem very professional
Voice:
-The voice seems professional, but not to the extent of say CNN or BBC
Design:
-A lot of white space to not distract the reader from the article at hand
-Looks very similar to an online newspaper
-Columns
Multimedia:
-Not as prevalent as Perez Hilton, but photos are shown in blog topics as well as within the physical post.

Purpose:
-A blog on recipes and other interesting ways to make unique meals
Voice:
-Voice seems to be passive, as if its a cooking show on a blog
-Does not seem formal at all
Design:
-The background of food only adds to the blog, giving it a complete feel of food as well as creating something
Multimedia:
-Not much multimedia is shown, occasionally a photo will be integrated into a blog, but it is nothing compared to Perez Hilton and Daily Beast

News/Politics: Hot Air
Purpose:
-A voice on modern politics, it is very opinionated, but that is simply within the nature of politics
Voice:
-Professional
-Seems much more uptight then the food blog as well as Perez Hilton
-Very opinionated and almost tense
Design:
-Similar to Daily Beast in the sense that neither has a background
-Individual posts divided into columns to ensure that more posts can be read
Multimedia:
-Each post has at least a picture and/or a video describing what is also in words
-Makes it much easier to understand the political ideas and is also visually stimulating

Science/Technology: Bad Astronomy
Purpose:
-Ironically enough its a pretty specific blog on the stars as well as other astronomic categories
-Actually seems to have some in-depth information
Voice:
-Although this is a harder topic to understand and many other blogs would have been rude, this blog has a very calm and respectable voice, almost as if its an elementary school teacher talking to a young student
Design:
-Very standard blog design
-Similar to blogger and others in the sense that its simple vertical and not in columns
Multimedia:
-Each individual post has a photo integrated into it, giving the reader a little something to compare the work to.

Look what I've stumble(d)upon


There is no true number that can define the number of pages on the internet. There are billions upon billions, each with something different to inform it's reader. Although there are billions of pages that can teach one how to cure a disease, write a poem, cook, or basically do anything, my favorite does none of the above. It is called StumbleUpon, a website that links you to other websites based off of your interests and past usage. Users make accounts and after a few minutes of questions the stumbling begins. In an age of New Media, where a woman in China can upload a photo of what they are wearing and blog about it with a teenager from Chicago, websites can now learn what you like and act accordingly. But is this new media?Is a website learning considered New Media? This is the real question. My personal account always knows how to get to me, it varies in results from mascot beating up a fan to a video of a squirrel water skiing to even showing me an invisible Swedish tree house. This website takes users to websites never heard of before, exploring the unknown areas of cyberspace. Could this be a new type of New Media, websites that learn about the user and bring them to places that will potentially catch their interest? The world may never have a true definition of New Media, so for now all I can do is stumble.


http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=stumbleupon&view=detail&id=A8BCC628E9480F47EE2F391B7BCB1DB4AD0FFAD5&first=1&FORM=IDFRIR

Monday, January 24, 2011

Motion Controlled Gaming

I'm sure everyone out there has at one point played Nintendo Wii...I mean, let's be honest, it's pretty fun. The Wii, which was the first Motion Controlled Gaming system has been around for a little over four years, and has been very popular. Since its creation, it has essentially been the only interactive gaming console where the user's motions dictate how the character moves on the screen. However, other companies such as Playstation and Kinect have been producing their own technologies in hopes of making an impact on the motion controlled game industry. PlayStation recently created Move, which is similar to the Wii but has higher quality graphics and focuses more on action video games such as KillZone 3 and US Navy Seals. Lastly, the system that many people think is going to make a real splash in the industry is called Kinect. What makes this technology so different from the rest is that it uses a camera to track its user's body movements. For example, if the user raises his or her eyebrow the Kinect responds by making the in game character do the same thing....it's like a video game version of Avatar! This system differs from PlayStation's Move and Nintendo Wii in that motions are tracked by a camera as opposed to the sensors on the hand held remote. It should be very interesting to see how big of a splash these new systems are able to make on the market. 
This picture shows how when playing Kinect the character on the screen mimics the movements of the user!
Photo Citation: http://www.gaj-it.com/wp-content/uploads/kinect4.jpg

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Academic Blogs in the Blogosphere

Where does collaborative writing fit within the
academic blogosphere?

What criterion does a particular blog need to meet in order to be considered an academic blog? After reviewing several blogs labeled “academic,” I’ve come up with my own understanding of what these criterion may be. For one, academic blogs are organized. Arguably the most noticeable similarity between all of these blogs was the fact that they had categories and archives. Both of these factors allow for easy navigation of any given blog. Another obvious factor is the more professional writing these bloggers exhibit in comparison to non-academic blogs. Although the blogger’s opinion comes through in his or her writing, the personal relationship that Andrew Sullivan discusses in his article Why I Blog is not seen to the same extent. Academic blogs have more of a defined purpose, discussing a particular topic such as art or politics. Non-academic blogs don’t necessarily have a particular theme throughout; instead they are more similar to the very public diary of the blogger. Because of this, the academic blogger does not express himself/herself to as great of an extent. Another part of the academic blog that stands out to me is the presence of Comment Policies. Crooked Timber has a Comment Policy that states

We welcome comments from readers on posts, but you do so as guests in our private space. Concepts of ‘censorship’ are not applicable. If your comments are blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic we will delete them and ban you from the site. The same goes for comments which are personally defamatory or insulting or which seek to derail a thread through provocation of one kind or another.

Although this allows for interaction between reader and blogger, it limits it greatly compared to an open forum. Many academic blogs hold the authority to delete comments they deem unnecessary or irrelevant. Academic blogs, in addition, all include “blogrolls” which Wikipedia defines in its Glossary of Blogging as “a list of other blogs that a blogger might recommend by providing links to them.” This allows academic blogs to gain creditability not only by being mentioned in another blog’s blogroll, but also by linking the reader to related blogs and websites.

However, in addition to these observations, I’ve also noticed that academic blogs differ in content as well as format. That is, the majority of the academic blogs in question included blog posts from several different contributors. However, some blogs, such as art(h)ist’ry and BollySpace 2.0, have only one blogger. While some academic bloggers are distinguished professors, other academic bloggers such as in the Intro to Politcal Theory Blog are students learning about the topic in discussion themselves. Also, some blog homepages, such as Crooked Timber, Front Porch Republic and Public Reason, included only excerpts of blog posts, linking the reader to another page in order to continue reading the entire post; other homepages, like that of art(h)ist’ry, Intro to Politcal Theory Blog, Observations on Film Art, Sweetland and BollySpace 2.0, displayed full posts, allowing the viewer to read them in their entirety. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a certain length that a post has to meet in order to have its place in an academic blog. For example, art(h)ist’ry contained relatively short posts with a lot of photographs. Perhaps the academic blog that stands out the most in comparison to the other blogs is Front Porch Republic. The format of this blog can be more closely associated with that of an online newspaper than the format of most other blogs. All of these variances between different academic blogs leave for a fuzzy understanding of the term as a whole.

Even my current understanding has left me with many unanswered questions. For example, Andrew Sullivan spoke greatly about the unfinished fashion of a blog; the raw emotion, the time constraints that don’t allow for over-thinking or very much editing. If this is what makes a blog unique from other forms of journalism, then where does an academic blog fit in with all of this? An academic blog is expected to be well thought out. For the most part the reader seeks creditable facts as opposed to opinion and speculation, although both of these factors have their place within academic blogs. Another key characteristic of a blog is the interactive nature between the blogger and reader. To what extent does this interactive aspect prevail in the academic blogosphere? These are just a few of the many remaining questions that linger in my mind after evaluating several academic blogs.


http://www.masternewmedia.org/online-collaborative-writing-how-blogs-and-wikis-are-changing-the-academic-publishing-process/

Academic Blogging, What's your definition?

What does it mean to be an Academic Blogger? According to Andrew Sullivan it means writing whatever comes to mind and I agree. In other words,"You can't have bloggers block." So then what do you write about? Does writing for an Academic Audience mean that your blog needs to appeal to a specific audience? For instance, the Art (h)ist'ry blog is written for an audience who appreciates art, culture, and design. The Intro to Political theory blog is solely written for those who are interested in studying politics.

Now lets look at blogs that pertain to a variety of different viewers. The Front Porch Republic discusses topics from "Women, The Cosmos, and Cosmetics" to "Art and Community." Although this blog has a satirical tone and all viewers must understand the same humor, the topics of discussion continue to vary. Similarly to the Front Porch Republic Sullivan's blog, The Atlantic, discusses topics that are completely different from one another. For instance one blog he discusses his reaction to 9/11 whereas another blog discusses his views on the War in Iraq, Once again all viewers share a similar interest in Sullivan's honesty and emotion, but overall Sullivan is not writing for a specific audience. He is simply writing about a majority of topics and he does not concentrate on a definite group of people.

Okay now lets backtrack. What is an Academic Blog? Does the information have to be directed to a specific audience such as a group of scientists interested in the same thing or can the blog contain a variety of information for an assortment of different readers whether they are doctors, pilots, or chefs?



OR









Does the Blog have to be only writing about the facts or can Sullivan's blog be considered Academic, writing about his personal opinions about a topic?

After researching Academic Blogs, I came to the conclusion that they are written to provide information to an audience. Having this in mind my major questions have to do with evaluating the information that is being displayed. Can it cover a variety of different topics or should it focus on just one academic topic? Can it be someone's opinion on a subject matter or does it just have to be straight facts? What do you guys think?



(Pictures: http://gettyimages.com, http://www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1098 2019, http://languagearts.pppst.com/fact-opinion.html

Articles: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/11/why-i-blog/7060/, http://arthistorian.wordpress.com/, http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/, http://polsci101.wordpress.com/, )


Saturday, January 22, 2011

Evaluating Some Academic Blogs


First of all, what constitutes an academic blog? What is the difference between a regular blog and an academic one? I myself didn't know, so I searched online for to find out some information. Academic blogs are "weblogs written by professors that will help you to learn about what life is like as a professor both inside and outside of the classroom" according to about.com. Shawn Moore, from hastac.orc seems to think that "academic blogs tend to be rather static and traditional posts that disseminate information rather than encourage participation and engagement".
According to Brad DeLong on Wikipedia.com, the academic blogosphere is "a kind of invisible college".
Since I couldn't get one concrete definition of the academic blog, I looked up websites that are known as academic blogs and decided to evaluate them to create my own understanding of the academic blogosphere.

http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/ is an academic blog about observations on film art. Personally, I would consider this as an academic blog because the readers learn something about the business of film. The author does not just share his opinions on movies and what he likes and dislikes, but he writes about facts and real-life statistics. If he does bring in his opinion, it is based on something concrete. The same is true for http://umsweetland.wordpress.com/. The difference, however, is the concentration. This academic blog does not solely discuss film art, but instead it talks about almost anything academic. For instance, there are posts about history and the Luddite's, but also random facts about the Sweetland Writing Center itself and its excellence and peer tutors. Although there is no specific focus on this blog, its posts are facts or opinions based on facts that are talked about so the reader can learn, but also formulate his/her own interpretations. This idea that I think is the essence of an academic blog is unlike the idea portrayed by the picture above. I believe that the picture is portraying two people, who first of all do not seem to like the idea of a blog, and have a "friend" who just started one where he can write his"insane opinions". This does not agree with my definition of an academic blog because it seems that the man is not writing to teach an audience about anything, rather he is probably looking to have a discussion with people about his opinions, theories, and ideas that could or could not be true. What do you guys think? Are these two blogs that I describe a difference between an academic blog and any other blog or am I missing something?

(photo from:http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2005/05/26/blogCartoon.jpg&imgrefurl=http://planning-research.com/academic-blog-friend-of-information-enemy-of-thought/&usg=__pTEx0wkYFpjH8Mv4CosA_-k4nvo=&h=436&w=600&sz=193&hl=en&start=0&sig2=HEIU5UWxNsZrws7oRkJX6Q&zoom=1&tbnid=tk1Igoccab8RbM:&tbnh=140&tbnw=193&ei=xDw7TeeuHIKB8gaDlpStCg&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dacademic%2Bblog%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1042%26bih%3D706%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=344&oei=xDw7TeeuHIKB8gaDlpStCg&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0&tx=62&ty=65)


Wednesday, January 19, 2011

How tech has changed society



I was walking through the diag today and saw a kid screaming by himself in an open patch of grass. In earlier times this man would have been assumed to have been either crazy or extremely unusual, but i realized that he had a bluetooth headset in his ear. Now my understanding of he situation has completely changed from him being a little crazy to being someone completely normal on their phone. Technology not only changes the way people get from place to place or how people do things, but now it changes social norms as well as perceptions of individuals. I find it ironic that it can change the way society works overall, its kind of like a form of evolution. New Media has changed the world in many ways, and this small change on society is a perfect example of how a small piece of technologly placed in ones ear can change them from a looney tune to a businessman.


photo from http://www.mobilewhack.com/motorola-h12-bluetooth-headset.jpg

A Cell Phone With Wallet Capabilities

Imagine being able to pay for your Starbucks latte by swiping your cell phone instead of your credit card...yeah, you read that correctly, your cell phone! New technology has recently been tested by various technology companies such as Intuit and PayPal that will allow consumers to use their mobile phones to pay for items ranging from a latte at Starbucks to a hot dog at a baseball game. In collaboration with Major League Baseball, Intuit was able to develop a software called "At Bat"that allows baseball fans to order and pay for their food without even leaving their seats! Fans are able to place their order and "swipe" their credit cards from any location in the ballpark by using this new application, and once their food is ready they will receive a text messaging telling them where to pick it up.

Because all of this technology is quite new, there are many questions that still have to be answered....the first one being which company will emerge as the leader in this new field. Many experts believe PayPal, which processed over 700 million dollars in mobile payments in 2010 alone, will be the one to break the bank with this new technology. However, for this to happen they will need the cooperation of credit card companies such as American Express and Visa, who would prefer to bypass PayPal as the middle man and create their own technologies with cell phone providers such as T-Mobile, AT&T and Verizon Wireless. Over the next few years, it should be interesting to see how these technologies evolve, especially when analysts project it to be a trillion dollar industry by the year 2020.

TwitChange 2.0

Almost unanimously, Twitter is considered to be a new media source in various aspects. This includes the way in which media is traveling from one source to many sources instantly, the response method which allows it to be interactive and the fact that anyone with a computer and an internet connection can participate in the phenomenon. One of the greatest things about twitter is that fans get to feel close to their celebrity idols by following their everyday tweets, and vice versa celebrities can reach out to their fans on what seems to be a more personal level, instantly.

TwitChange 2.0 is a celebrity charity auction where fans can bid on a chance to be followed by, mentioned in a tweet or retweeted by their favorite celebrities. All of the proceeds go to great charities, which include helping the people of Haiti and Operation Once in a Lifetime, which works to make the dreams of United States Service members and their families come true. Some of the biggest celebrity advocates so far include Eva Longoria, Justin Beiber, Kim Kardashian and Troy Polamalu. The bidding will not even begin until January 29, 2011, and the site has already been named Mashable’s 2010 winner for the Most Creative Social Good Campaign!

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

A pet's facebook

Facebook.com, a social networking website, is almost unanimously considered to be new media. Therefore, I think anamigo.com should be as well. This website has every main aspect of my definition of new media: it is instant, it allows for personalization, and it allows for interaction. Anamigo is a website in which users make pages for their pets, whether it be a dog, cat, rabbit, or monkey. These users then interact with other pet-lovers, as they can write on each other's pages, post and comment on photos, make play dates for their pets, and more.

Although this sounds much like facebook, anamigo goes one step further, as it also enables fellow pet lovers to find pet necessities in their areas, such as veterinarians, shelters, food and clothing shops, and more. In these regards, I think anamigo is a great place for pet lovers to make friends with other pet lovers, while their pets become friends as well.


Great Products for a Great Price

I know that I am not the only one who feels this way, but all day everyday I am constantly thinking about food. Where should I go to eat for dinner? What kind of food am I in the mood for at the moment? Now that I am a college student the next question is, How much does it cost?
Groupon.com is a great way for all of these questions to be answered.
You can quickly subscribe and after typing in your city a wide variety of options are now available. Right now it says "$10 for $20 worth of Burgers, Drinks, and More at Rosie O'Grady's."
If you scroll down there are the directions to this restaurant along with the phone number followed by an assortment of personal reviews. This website also states how many people have already used this deal and it encourages people who have been to O'Grady's to provide their own input about their experience.

Overall New Media is revolutionary and interactive. I found this website and after reading on I saw that it does not only pertain to food. There are discounts for shoes and other goods as well. The website is fully interactive and by that I mean, people can post their opinion about the discounts directly on the website or they could transfer the information to Twitter and Facebook. New Media requires a high level of participation accompanied with information on demand. Groupon.com successfully connects these two definitions and personally it is a form of New Media I have never seen before.

A perspective on Sullivan's "Why I Blog"

In Andrew Sullivan’s “Why I Blog”, the author explains all of the addictive features and what blogging has to offer.

The writer initially begins by stating how it allows for anyone to publish themselves on the largest stage possible, the Internet, and from there have the potential to write or blog something that no one has ever thought of before. The fact that blogging is instantaneous is something new for society; the idea that anyone can say anything and have it heard virtually around the world is remarkable in a time when the world is dominated by news reporters and newspapers. Blogs bring the power back to the people and keep a lot of it away from big business, which is why I find it extremely ironic when people have the job title “Professional Blogger”. In this sense blogging is a simple way for people to voice their unheard opinion, whether it be on a movie, political decision, or sporting event. This is the first thing blogs bring to the table; they give power to the little guy.

Later in the article Sullivan brings up another interesting thought, the idea that blogs have to be instant to survive. This is a very valid statement in the sense that if a blog is to slow to voice an opinion, the “professional” writers at newspapers and magazines can voice their opinions as well, many a time making blogs less and less interesting to read. Blogs live in the instant something happens, which is the beauty of a blog. It is now. If blogs had to be revised or published it would not be a blog, but rather an online article.

My personal favorite point that Sullivan brings up is the fact that blogging allows people to be themselves. If an individual has to write for say the New York Times or any other accredited form of news, they are writing to a specific audience, the reader, but as a blog author I am not bound by trying to please a reader. I can write a blog based off of my favorite cheese or a blog that comments on every painting made from 1300-1345 in Southern France. Blogs allow the author to say whatever they feel instantly, which are why they are so addicting. Authors of books are essentially writing to gain an audience, in turn to make money in order to pay for the paper and processing of the work, but the best part of a blog is that its free to make, free to read, and free to enjoy. In this modern day and age the only barriers from blogging are a steady internet connection, and a computer to type on, after that there are nothing. Blogs allow for anyone to be themselves.

My final criticism on Sullivan’s piece is when he states that “A Democratic blog will, for example, be forced to link to Republican ones, if only to attack and mock.” (Sullivan 10) I find this not entirely true due to the fact that anyone can make an argument based on facts and good sources, but there is no need to discredit an argument to your source. I find that very similar to 5 year olds fighting, when one child insults another they fight back by insulting some more. I don’t see any issues in taking the high road and ignoring to opposition and instead proving ones own point. This is my one issue with Sullivan’s logic.

Sullivan is a great blogger, and just like him and Tyler I’m addicted as well.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Response To Andrew Sullivan's "Why I Blog"

So according to Andrew Sullivan, "blogging is intoxicatingly free...like taking a narcotic." Thats ironic coming from somebody who was arrested for drug possession in Cape Cod on July 13th, 2009. Anyway, after reading Sullivan's article I found that he raised many very interesting points about the uniqueness of blogging, and what makes it such an addictive hobby.

One of the first points that Sullivan makes that I found myself thinking about was how other types of writers such as novelists and journalists have extended periods of time to plan their writing and when it's done there are professionals to look it over. For bloggers on the other hand, the deadline is now and you are your own editor. Once you click the Publish Post button, that writing is gone and you cant get it back. What makes it even harder for bloggers is that once they publish something with an error there is no section of the blog the next day that can correct the mistype or inaccurate statistic. You're stuck dealing with vicious emails or response posts telling you how stupid you are for misspelling a word or that your writing is no longer credible because you had a few incorrect numbers.

Another compelling point that Sullivan makes is the idea of "being yourself" when you blog. I found it really interesting how he talked about bloggers attempting to hide themselves from their audience. I think if you approach blogging with that kind of attitude, you can not possibly write an attention grabbing blog. I think this shows that in order to write a blog that is truly you, the blogger must have some courage and self confidence. The next point Sullivan makes, is the one I found most interesting. He talks about how over the course of his blogging career the posts he remembers most are the ones that have to do with the most emotional issues. He talks about how he and the readers of his blog experienced  emotional events such as 9/11 together. I very much agree with Sullivan when he says that catastrophic events such as 9/11 force out the "real" you and that it's impossible to write a blog during trying times without revealing a lot about yourself and creating a strong bond with your readers. However, despite this personal connection that can be made from blogging, I disagree with Sullivan because I think many personal blog/websites are losing their individuality. Sites such as Perez Hilton that were once started by a single aspiring soul are now carried out by others and Hilton himself does little to actually maintain the site.

The last few points that Sullivan made were also ones that I found to be interesting. He finished the article by talking about why making a successful blog is much harder than writing say, an article or book. I think the main reason for this belief is that traditional literature is expected to have been planned out and well edited. Blog posts, are written spontaneously and can be edited by one person: the writer. The last point and maybe most important point Sullivan makes is that no matter what blog you are on you will always see two sides of the spectrum, unlike traditional literature which can lean in a single direction. The reason for this being that because blogs are all connected there is sure to be a link to a the opposing side's argument.

I enjoyed reading Sullivan's article, and I now understand why blogging is like taking a narcotic.